Procurement, Delivery & Acceptance

What should FAT and SAT verify for a mine power system, and what evidence should each retain?

Separate factory and site acceptance for mine generation and define evidence for equipment, controls, protection, load test, installation, interfaces and handover.

FAT proves that equipment can perform in the agreed factory configuration. SAT proves that the installed system works with real fuel, ventilation, distribution, controls and loads. Neither replaces the other, and a few running photos are not an evidence package.

What the acceptance plan must produce

Intended audience

Owners, EPC teams, suppliers and site teams responsible for procurement, inspection, installation, commissioning and acceptance.

Engineering focus

Turn specification clauses into observable, measurable, signable and traceable FAT and SAT items.

Project deliverable

Produce procedures, acceptance criteria, instruments, responsibilities, raw records, punch lists and closeout evidence.

Engineering summary

Freeze the acceptance matrix before manufacture. Put configuration, wiring, controls, protection and factory-testable performance in FAT; put installation, fuel, ventilation, earthing, upstream distribution and real interfaces in SAT. Every item needs acceptance criteria and evidence.

01

Convert the specification into an acceptance matrix

Do not define acceptance after equipment is complete. Map the single-line, data sheets, control narrative, protection settings, communications and deliverables to FAT, SAT or document review.

  • State requirement source and acceptance criteria
  • Assign witness, review and signature responsibility
  • Record instrument identity, accuracy and calibration

02

Use FAT for build configuration and standalone functions

Confirm nameplates, components, assembly, wiring, insulation, logic, alarms, trips, protection, synchronization, paralleling and agreed load performance. Transfer unrepresentative site conditions to SAT explicitly.

  • Verify engine, alternator, controller and switchgear
  • Test circuits, terminals, interlocks, alarms and emergency stop
  • Record voltage, frequency, load and temperature trends

03

Control punch items before release

Each finding needs identity, consequence, owner and due date. Safety, configuration or core-function issues block release; site-close items require an agreed condition and verification method.

  • Retain issue photos, data and repair record
  • Separate release blockers and site actions
  • Freeze drawing and software versions before packing

04

Use SAT for installation and system interfaces

Verify foundation, vibration, exhaust, ventilation, fuel, earthing, cables, phase sequence, protection, communications and upstream distribution. Starting a standalone unit does not prove system readiness.

  • Check dimensions, torque, fluids, leaks and clearances
  • Test ATS, paralleling, shedding and remote signals
  • Apply staged site load and record stability

05

Handover a complete evidence package

Include approved procedures, raw data, signatures, alarms and trends, punch closeout, as-builts, settings, software backup, training and maintenance baseline.

  • Index FAT, SAT and outstanding items
  • Confirm as-builts match the field
  • Have owner, EPC and supplier sign the responsibility boundary

FAT and SAT evidence matrix

Test itemRequirement source, FAT/SAT location and procedure
AcceptanceValue, state, action time or document completeness
ConditionsLoad, environment, fuel, system state and prerequisites
Instrument and peopleInstrument, calibration, operator, witness and signature
Raw evidenceReadings, trends, alarms, photos, video and record
CloseoutItem, grade, owner, date and verification evidence

Three acceptance gaps

01

FAT limited to appearance and start

Controls, protection, paralleling and load risk move to site untested.

02

Using FAT instead of SAT

Factory tests cannot prove site ventilation, earthing, fuel, distribution and interfaces.

03

Summary result without raw records

Without data, version and signatures, acceptance is not traceable.

Information required before test notice

  • Specification, data sheets and approved drawings are frozen
  • The matrix covers every system and interface
  • Each item has criteria, instrument and owner
  • Load bank and site-load arrangements are confirmed
  • Punch grading, release and closure rules are approved
  • As-builts, training and maintenance baseline are in handover

Have an engineer review the FAT and SAT scope

Share the specification, single-line, loads, control logic, site interfaces and delivery milestones to define tests, acceptance criteria, ownership and evidence.

Get engineering supportBack to the mining blog
Email engineer