Power Systems & Expansion

When should a mine use low-voltage paralleling, and when should it move to 6.3–11 kV generation?

Compare mine low-voltage paralleling and 6.3–11 kV generation using capacity, distance, current, cables, existing bus, protection, operation and expansion.

Voltage is not selected by one fixed power threshold. The same capacity serving nearby concentrated loads or distant distributed loads produces different cable, switchgear, loss, protection and expansion outcomes.

What boundary this article establishes

Intended audience

Teams planning a new mine power station, extending an LV station or approaching cable and bus limits.

Engineering focus

Compare capacity, distance, existing distribution, protection, operational capability and expansion in one decision.

Project deliverable

Produce traceable LV paralleling, MV generation or step-up transmission options and triggers for the next design stage.

Engineering summary

Calculate current, voltage drop, losses and switchgear limits for each option under continuous and fault conditions, then include the existing bus, protection and operating capability. Total capacity is an input, not the sole answer.

01

Map load location and transmission distance

LV can be direct when generation is close to a concentrated load. As crushers, pump stations, shafts and camps spread out, high LV current increases cable quantity, drop and installation complexity.

  • Map generating, distribution and load points
  • Record route, installation and environment
  • Calculate normal, standby and expansion flows

02

Compare current, cables and switchgear

Higher voltage reduces current for the same power but adds MV switchgear, protection, earthing and operating requirements. Compare the complete installed system.

  • Calculate feeder and bus continuous and starting current
  • Compare cable quantity, size, tray and terminations
  • Check breaker interrupting duty and equipment availability

03

Check what the existing system can accept

Expansion is constrained by bus voltage, transformer capacity, fault level, earthing and selectivity. Retaining LV generation with step-up transmission can sometimes be more practical than replacing every unit.

  • Verify single-line diagrams and nameplates
  • Calculate fault current with new generation
  • Confirm interconnection, transformer and protection compatibility

04

Include operation and maintenance capability

MV requires clearances, interlocks, test equipment, switching procedures and qualified personnel. LV paralleling also needs synchronization, load sharing and selective protection.

  • Define switching, isolation and service boundaries
  • Confirm local skills and support
  • List protection and recurring tests

05

Use expansion stages to define architecture

An LV solution today may reach its limit in the next phase. State how many units can be added, which component reaches its limit first and when step-up or a new station is required.

  • Model current, approved and long-term stages
  • Record margin in cables, bus, switchgear and fuel
  • Define interfaces and voltage-transition triggers

Inputs for low- and medium-voltage comparison

CapacityUnit and total rating, online units, reserve and load factor
DistanceGenerator-to-bus and load routes, installation and environment
ElectricalVoltage, current, drop, losses, fault and starting duty
Existing systemBus, transformers, switchgear, earthing and protection
OperationsCompetence, switching, tests, spares and service
ExpansionStages, interfaces, margins and upgrade triggers

Three common errors

01

Selecting voltage from total power only

Distance, distribution and the existing bus may set the boundary first.

02

Comparing generator price only

Cables, switchgear, transformers, civil work, losses and service change lifecycle cost.

03

Ignoring fault and protection coordination

Added generation can exceed switchgear duty and remove selectivity.

Information required before selection

  • Load locations, capacities and distances are mapped
  • LV and MV single-line options exist
  • Current, drop, losses and fault calculations are traceable
  • Existing bus, transformer and protection data are complete
  • Local MV operating and maintenance capability is confirmed
  • Expansion stages and transition triggers are documented

Have an engineer review the LV–MV boundary

Share total and unit capacity, transmission distance, existing bus, expansion and protection data to compare current, cables, switchgear, operation and growth.

Get engineering supportBack to the mining blog
Email engineer